Paper Trail Politics Election directory My Area

November 3, 2026 General Election · Election night returns

Shasta County election results

43,425ballots counted37.6% of 115,385 registered voters
67contests on the ballotwith semi-official returns

Turnout as ballots are counted

Same point in the count (6 days after Election Day):

  • 202637.6%so far
  • 202252.0%(61.8% final)
  • 202436.5%(78.0% final)
Nov 2022 generalNov 2024 generalNov 2026
0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+7 days+14 days+21 days+28 days2022: 61.8% final2024: 78.0% final2026: 37.6%0%20%40%60%80%Election Day+14 days+28 days2022 61.8%2024 78.0%2026 37.6%
Show the data
YearCounty reportHours after polls closedBallots countedTurnout
20222022-11-08 20:130.225,78523.10%
20222022-11-08 21:572.029,93126.82%
20222022-11-08 22:532.933,89230.37%
20222022-11-08 23:463.836,21832.45%
20222022-11-11 16:3368.646,90442.03%
20222022-11-16 17:45189.866,68559.75%
20222022-11-18 15:26235.467,89860.84%
20222022-11-23 13:37353.668,73161.58%
20222022-11-29 12:57497.068,98661.81%
20242024-11-05 20:210.413,27611.48%
20242024-11-05 22:422.714,23312.31%
20242024-11-06 01:005.015,80313.67%
20242024-11-06 02:446.718,42015.93%
20242024-11-06 04:508.820,69717.90%
20242024-11-06 07:2711.423,85220.63%
20242024-11-07 16:2744.527,05223.40%
20242024-11-08 16:3168.533,25828.76%
20242024-11-12 18:31166.546,11139.88%
20242024-11-15 18:47238.873,06563.19%
20242024-11-19 17:11333.275,66165.44%
20242024-11-22 18:41406.778,13667.58%
20242024-11-27 19:53527.989,17377.12%
20242024-12-04 16:42692.790,16277.98%
20262026-11-03 22:172.325,80122.32%
20262026-11-04 02:056.127,41723.72%
20262026-11-04 03:377.628,92525.02%
20262026-11-04 05:339.630,46126.35%
20262026-11-04 07:4711.831,82527.53%
20262026-11-05 14:5943.034,83030.19%
20262026-11-06 12:1864.337,85332.81%
20262026-11-06 12:2164.437,85332.81%
20262026-11-09 12:36136.643,42537.63%

From the county’s results updates, timed from 8 p.m. on Election Day; earlier years are linear between updates.

D DemocraticR Republican* IncumbentLocal offices are nonpartisan.

Where available, statewide or districtwide totals from the California Secretary of State are shown first. Races that extend beyond this county offer “County only” for the county registrar’s count. Reports may update at different times.

Statewide offices 9

State propositions 14

  • California Proposition 1Yes/No questionProposition 1Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $11.25 billion in state general obligation bonds for housing affordability programs, including multifamily rental housing, mortgages for veterans, supportive housing, preservation of existing affordable housing, and downpayment assistance. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 25 years to repay the housing bond.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $11.25 billion through general obligation bonds to support veterans and affordable housing programs.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.0%6,733,027
    2. NoNo39.0%4,296,574
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 2Yes/No questionProposition 2Ballot question

    INCREASES STATE’S RAINY DAY FUND. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Increases California's Rainy Day Fund, approved by voters in 2014, to provide funding for education, health care, public safety, and other essential services during economic downturns. Fiscal Impact: State budget reserves would be higher.

    A yes vote means

    State budget reserve rules would change so the Rainy Day Fund holds more money, and the state would make extra debt payments for longer.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes61.3%6,759,767
    2. NoNo38.7%4,260,447
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 3Yes/No questionProposition 3Ballot question

    PROVIDES PERMANENT FUNDING FOR SCHOOLS AND HEALTH CARE BY EXTENDING EXISTING TAX ON HIGH INCOMES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Makes permanent existing voter-approved tax rates for individuals earning over $371,000 (adjusted annually for inflation). Allocates tax revenues to public education. Fiscal Impact: Maintains $5 billion to $15 billion of annual state income tax revenue by making a temporary tax increase on high-income earners permanent instead of letting it expire in 2031.

    A yes vote means

    An income tax increase on high-income earners in place since 2012 would become permanent instead of expiring in 2031.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes60.6%6,733,849
    2. NoNo39.4%4,380,460
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 4Yes/No questionProposition 4Ballot question

    REPEALS PROHIBITION AGAINST PUBLIC FUNDING OF ELECTION CAMPAIGNS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Repeals prohibition on state and local governments offering public funding of candidate election campaigns. Public funding programs may not use funds earmarked for education, transportation, or public safety. Fiscal Impact: Ongoing costs to the state of a few hundred thousand dollars each year for the Fair Political Practices Commission to answer questions from state and local governments about public campaign finance programs.

    A yes vote means

    State and local governments could create public campaign financing programs for candidates, subject to limits on which public funds could be used and how.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo50.3%5,474,047
    2. YesYes49.7%5,406,205
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 5Yes/No questionProposition 5Ballot question

    CHANGES RECALL ELECTION PROCESS FOR STATEWIDE OFFICERS. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Under current law, voters elect replacement candidates at the same time as the recall election. This measure instead fills recall vacancies by subsequent special election or appointment. Fiscal Impact: Net fiscal effect unknown. In the event of a recall, savings or costs of millions of dollars to administer the election depending on the office recalled.

    A yes vote means

    Recall elections would no longer ask who should fill the vacancy; vacancies typically would be filled by special election or appointment.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes52.0%5,562,022
    2. NoNo48.0%5,134,433
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 37Yes/No questionProposition 37Ballot question

    CREATES LOAN PROGRAM FOR MIDDLE-INCOME BUYERS OF QUALIFIED NEW HOMES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $25 billion in bonds to offer eligible buyers fixed-rate mortgages for up to 17% of purchase price of a newly constructed home priced below about $1.5 million. Borrowers must be California residents, occupy the home, meet income limits, and pay at least 3% down. Bonds repaid by mortgage payments, not State. Fiscal Impact: No direct state or local costs.

    A yes vote means

    The state would create a homebuying assistance program funded by up to $25 billion in revenue bonds repaid by homeowners' loan payments.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes62.3%6,834,106
    2. NoNo37.7%4,132,590
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 38Yes/No questionProposition 38Ballot question

    AUTHORIZES BONDS FOR IMMUNOLOGY MEDICAL RESEARCH. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds for immunology and immunotherapy research, half to a single University of California-affiliated nonprofit medical research institute, half to research grants. Fiscal Impact: Increased state cost of $500 million to $600 million annually for about 20 years to repay the research bond, with some or all of the cost offset if the funded research generates revenue.

    A yes vote means

    The state could borrow $8.4 billion to support immunology and immunotherapy research by California research institutes and universities.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes54.2%5,963,079
    2. NoNo45.8%5,032,758
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 39Yes/No questionProposition 39Ballot question

    PROHIBITS CITIZENS FROM VOTING UNLESS THEY PRESENT GOVERNMENT-ISSUED IDENTIFICATION. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Invalidates mail ballots that do not have last four digits of designated government-issued identification number written on envelope. Prohibits in-person voting without presenting government-issued identification. Fiscal Impact: Costs of between tens of millions of dollars and low hundreds of millions of dollars each year to implement new voting requirements.

    A yes vote means

    Voters would be required to present additional identifying information, such as government-issued identification, to elections officials each time they vote.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo60.6%6,774,474
    2. YesYes39.4%4,407,227
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 40Yes/No questionProposition 40Ballot question

    IMPOSES ONE-TIME TAX ON CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Imposes 5% tax on certain taxpayers with assets over $1 billion; revenue primarily for health care. Exempts revenues from constitutional requirements for school funding and spending limit. Fiscal Impact: Temporary revenue increase of tens of billions of dollars spread over several years from wealth tax on billionaires. Possible ongoing decrease of less than $1 billion per year in income tax revenue from billionaires.

    A yes vote means

    The state would collect a one-time tax from billionaires equal to 5 percent of their wealth.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo52.8%5,909,899
    2. YesYes47.2%5,288,424
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 41Yes/No questionProposition 41Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE TAXES THAT EXCLUDE REVENUES FROM STATE SPENDING LIMIT. REQUIRES AUDITS FOR NEW STATE SPECIAL TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Nullifies state taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that exempt their revenues from voter-approved state spending limit. Requires pre-election and recurring audits of programs funded by new special taxes. Fiscal Impact: The net fiscal effect is unknown as it depends on future decisions by voters, the Legislature, and other policymakers.

    A yes vote means

    The State Auditor would review programs funded by new special taxes, and the state might not be able to exclude new special tax spending from its spending limit.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo54.9%6,035,499
    2. YesYes45.1%4,961,912
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 42Yes/No questionProposition 42Ballot question

    PROHIBITS NEW STATE PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES AND CERTAIN RETROACTIVE STATE TAXES. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Prohibits any new state tax (1) imposed on the ownership of personal property (all things people own other than real estate), or (2) that applies retroactively based on taxpayer’s past activities. Nullifies taxes enacted after January 1, 2026 that conflict with this measure. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that tax revenues will not go up as much in the future.

    A yes vote means

    The state could not establish new taxes on the ownership of financial assets or other personal property.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. YesYes51.6%5,733,734
    2. NoNo48.4%5,371,123
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 43Yes/No questionProposition 43Ballot question

    LIMITS VOTERS’ ABILITY TO RAISE REVENUES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Limits voters’ ability to pass voter-proposed local special taxes by increasing percentage of votes needed to approve such ballot measures from a majority (over 50%) to two-thirds, beginning January 1, 2027. Fiscal Impact: Possibility that local government tax revenues will not go up as much in the future due to a higher vote threshold for certain taxes.

    A yes vote means

    Certain voter-proposed local special taxes would require two-thirds voter approval instead of a majority.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo57.3%6,257,179
    2. YesYes42.7%4,667,905
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 44Yes/No questionProposition 44Ballot question

    REQUIRES COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS SPEND 90% OF REVENUE ON PROGRAM SERVICES. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Imposes penalties on nonprofit Federally Qualified Health Centers (community clinics providing primary care to medically underserved areas and populations) that spend less than 90% of revenue on “program services” advancing their charitable purpose, including but not limited to patient services. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs in the low tens of millions of dollars per year, covered by fees.

    A yes vote means

    Certain private nonprofit health clinics would have to spend at least 90 percent of their revenue each year on providing health care services.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo82.1%8,946,122
    2. YesYes17.9%1,955,845
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • California Proposition 45Yes/No questionProposition 45Ballot question

    MODIFIES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CERTAIN PROJECTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Amends California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to expedite environmental review for certain projects (including most housing, transportation, water, and health projects) by setting deadlines to complete environmental review and resolve lawsuits challenging project approvals. Fiscal Impact: Initial costs for state and local governments, likely in the high tens of millions of dollars—potentially exceeding $100 million—annually, partly covered by fees. Uncertain, potentially more significant positive or negative longer-term fiscal effects.

    A yes vote means

    Certain public and private projects would be eligible for new environmental review and court challenge procedures with tighter time limits.

    Source: California Secretary of State, Official Voter Information Guide ↗
    1. NoNo56.1%6,103,353
    2. YesYes43.9%4,766,652
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State

Judicial retention 9

  • Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Presiding Justice Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Administrative Presiding Justice Laurie Earl, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes56.3%18,723
    2. NoNo43.7%14,526
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Aimee A. Feinberg, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes51.6%16,469
    2. NoNo48.4%15,475
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice David B. Sapp, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. NoNo50.4%16,406
    2. YesYes49.6%16,156
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Jonathan Renner, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes56.1%18,244
    2. NoNo43.9%14,270
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice Joshua Groban, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Joshua GrobanBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Joshua Groban be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Joshua Groban on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes71.5%6,320,411
    2. NoNo28.5%2,517,810
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans, California Supreme CourtYes/No questionAssociate Justice Kelli M. EvansBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Kelli M. Evans be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Kelli M. Evans on the California Supreme Court for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes72.5%6,401,321
    2. NoNo27.5%2,426,861
    Statewide count23,860 of 23,860 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 7:18 p.m. PTSource: California Secretary of State
  • Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Lauri Damrell, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes52.9%17,381
    2. NoNo47.1%15,474
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Shama Mesiwala, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. NoNo51.4%16,692
    2. YesYes48.6%15,770
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictYes/No question
    Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third DistrictBallot question (form set by state law)

    Shall Associate Justice Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District be elected to the office for the term provided by law?

    A yes vote means

    A yes vote keeps Retention of Associate Justice Stacy Boulware Eurie, Court of Appeal, Third District on the Court of Appeal for a new term; a no vote removes the justice, and the Governor appoints a replacement.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: California Elections Code § 13203 (retention ballot form) ↗
    1. YesYes55.3%18,057
    2. NoNo44.7%14,578
    Shasta County voters only61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

U.S. House 1

State Legislature 1

County and Superior Court 1

City offices 3

Anderson

  • City of Anderson City Council Member3 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. SLStan L Neutze44.6%1,114
    2. LLLexus L. Alexander31.9%797
    3. ASAmarjit Singh23.5%587
    Shasta County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Redding

  • City of Redding City Council Member9 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 9 win
    1. Russ Wenham21.6%11,805
    2. Tenessa Audette19.1%10,387
    3. Mark Mezzano14.6%7,934
    4. Christina Prosperi13.1%7,138
    5. Jack Munns8.0%4,365
    6. Joana Rebollar6.9%3,775
    7. Paul Saulsbury6.3%3,421
    8. Elise Ramirez Sloan6.0%3,251
    9. Rebecca Anne Miller4.5%2,448
    Shasta County count25 of 27 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Shasta Lake

  • City of Shasta Lake City Council Member3 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 3 win
    1. Justin Jones44.0%1,302
    2. Pamelyn Anne Morgan37.7%1,117
    3. Dolores Lucero18.3%542
    Shasta County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

School and college boards 20

Anderson Union High School

  • Anderson Union High School Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 23 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. JGJoe Gibson38.9%518
    2. HMHellen Meade32.3%431
    3. BSBridget Soksoda28.8%384
    Shasta County count5 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Anderson Union High School District

  • Anderson Union High School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 13 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. EPElke Proscher49.1%653
    2. DSDaniel Scoville35.6%473
    3. JGJacquline Gallardo-Gallegos15.3%203
    Shasta County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Anderson Union High School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 42 candidates
    1. GHGeorge H. Wold II50.2%793
    2. CHCharley Hawkins49.8%788
    Shasta County count6 of 7 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Bella Vista Elementary School

  • Bella Vista Elementary School Governing Board Member4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. LSLaurie Stringer28.9%550
    2. JCJackie Corn28.6%543
    3. LELisha E. Stockton21.7%412
    4. PGPaul Goedecke20.8%395
    Shasta County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Cascade Elementary School

  • Cascade Elementary School Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 23 candidatesTop 1 of 3 wins
    1. MCMichael Costa41.5%184
    2. DCDiane Cannan32.7%145
    3. SSShelby Stutesman25.7%114
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Fall River Joint Unified School District

  • Fall River Joint Unified School District Governing Board Member5 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 5 win
    1. JNJeanne Norris24.9%941
    2. MCMichelle Corder23.9%902
    3. JIJennifer Imus22.5%851
    4. IVIgnacio 'iggy' Venegas17.5%662
    5. RDRichard Doetch11.2%421
    Shasta County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Gateway Unified School District

  • Gateway Unified School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 24 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. LGLinda Glass31.4%1,408
    2. CKCamille King30.2%1,353
    3. DRDale R. Wallace19.2%863
    4. CBCasey Bowden19.2%861
    Shasta County count7 of 7 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Gateway Unified School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 32 candidates
    1. BHBriana Hutsell55.1%1,215
    2. LHLindsi Haynes44.9%990
    Shasta County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Happy Valley Union School District

  • Happy Valley Union School District Governing Board Member11 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 11 win
    1. JKJeffrey Kuwahara18.1%521
    2. JSJodi Shearman15.6%449
    3. TGTim Garman14.8%426
    4. SDSteven D. Joseph12.0%344
    5. JHJohn Hartman11.1%318
    6. JMJustin M. Martin6.7%194
    7. LNLee Nichols5.7%163
    8. JDJessica Dunlap5.1%147
    9. SPSarah Prather5.0%144
    10. AMAlice Millner4.9%142
    11. RMRex Mannion1.0%29
    Shasta County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Millville Elementary School

  • Millville Elementary School Governing Board Member5 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 5 win
    1. BWBeth Watt22.6%258
    2. WHWhitney Hathaway20.2%230
    3. JLJennifer Lamprecht20.0%228
    4. SHSandra Harpe19.1%218
    5. JMJillian McCullough18.1%206
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Millville Elementary School Governing Board Member – Short Term 2 Year2 candidates
    1. KMKayti Mann53.1%239
    2. THTaryn Ham46.9%211
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Mountain Grove Elementary School District

  • Mountain Grove Elementary School District Governing Board Member8 candidates · vote for 5Top 5 of 8 win
    1. LDLynn Dorroh15.4%225
    2. JMJanene Montoya14.6%213
    3. SCShelley Case14.2%207
    4. SCSierra Crawford14.0%204
    5. JMJames Mike Henderson13.2%193
    6. FCFred C. Newell11.0%160
    7. SKShane Kidson10.2%149
    8. JRJohn Rodrigues Jr.7.3%107
    Shasta County count3 of 3 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Pacheco Union School

  • Pacheco Union School Governing Board Member5 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 5 win
    1. WWWilliam 'bill' Woodbury27.0%1,457
    2. JTJohn Tetens22.3%1,205
    3. MAMary Anders21.6%1,164
    4. APAmber Pitner19.8%1,071
    5. SFSydney Flowers - Grissom9.3%502
    Shasta County count5 of 7 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Red Bluff Joint Union High School District

  • Red Bluff Joint Union High School District Governing Board Member4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. LRLela Rosas29.2%43
    2. KMKatie Mackey Harris25.9%38
    3. TJTiffany Jourdan24.5%36
    4. JHJake Hickok20.4%30
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Redding School District

  • Redding School District Governing Board Member6 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 6 win
    1. RHRebecca Haskins22.5%3,622
    2. SOSanny Ong21.6%3,481
    3. BWBobbie Wion17.4%2,800
    4. JHJennifer Heyne16.3%2,624
    5. MOMichael Odell12.3%1,989
    6. KSKelleny Solarte9.8%1,584
    Shasta County count12 of 14 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Shasta College

  • Shasta College Governing Board Member, Trustee Area B2 candidates
    1. PCPeggy Colwell62.6%3,816
    2. JWJohn Wildey37.4%2,284
    Shasta County count18 of 21 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Shasta County

  • Shasta County Board of Education Trustee Area 16 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 6 win
    1. BRBruce Ross27.5%6,705
    2. MRMichele Renee Tyson21.2%5,174
    3. NWNancy Walker20.1%4,911
    4. MZMadison Zimmerman16.5%4,022
    5. DSDan Sloan12.6%3,082
    6. DMDawn M Willoughby2.1%514
    Shasta County count23 of 26 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Shasta County Board of Education Trustee Area 24 candidates · vote for 2Top 2 of 4 win
    1. AGAuthur Gorman32.0%12,091
    2. TRTeresa Roberts29.0%10,971
    3. LMLisa Marie Barry23.2%8,780
    4. SSShaye Stephens15.8%5,972
    Shasta County count44 of 49 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Shasta Union High School District

  • Shasta Union High School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 22 candidates
    1. AHAndrea Hoheisel74.3%2,468
    2. TGTaunya Gren25.7%853
    Shasta County count9 of 9 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Shasta Union High School District Governing Board Member, Trustee Area 52 candidates
    1. LWLucas Wilson58.9%2,388
    2. BPBrian P Wright41.1%1,665
    Shasta County count13 of 14 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Special districts 3

Burney Fire Protection District

  • Burney Fire Protection District, Director4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. MGMichael Goodner27.8%502
    2. PGPamela Grant25.6%461
    3. IMIrene May24.7%446
    4. KVKaren Vancleave21.9%395
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Happy Valley Fire Protection District

  • Happy Valley Fire Protection District, Director4 candidates · vote for 3Top 3 of 4 win
    1. SPShannon Prather31.4%812
    2. KCKenneth Carter30.4%786
    3. JFJames Fernandez27.8%718
    4. BSBilly Soksoda10.4%268
    Shasta County count4 of 4 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

Shasta Fire Protection,

County, school and district measures 6

  • Measure C – Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District, College Facilities BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure CBallot question

    To improve college facilities serving students, veterans, and residents; renovate job training spaces including welding, public safety, agriculture and nursing; make accessibility improvements for the disabled; and acquire, construct, and renovate classrooms/buildings; shall Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District's measure be adopted authorizing $129,630,000 of bonds at legal rates, estimated levies averaging $7.76 per $100,000 assessed value (raising $7,800,000 annually) while bonds are outstanding with annual audits, independent citizens' oversight committee, and all funds remaining local?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Shasta-Tehama-Trinity Joint Community College District (Shasta College) to issue $129.63 million in bonds, levied at an estimated average of $7.76 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $7.8 million annually), to renovate and build college facilities.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. NoNo52.6%21,243
    2. YesYes47.4%19,139
    Shasta County count61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Measure D – Columbia Elementary School District, School BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure DBallot question

    To improve the quality of education at Columbia Elementary School and Mountain View Middle School; replace deteriorating plumbing and sewer systems; upgrade inadequate electrical systems; modernize old classrooms; replace outdated heating/cooling systems; maximize state funding eligibility; replace aging portables; make safety/security improvements; shall Columbia Elementary School District's measure authorizing $11,500,000 in bonds at legal rates be adopted, with average levies of $23.49 per $100,000 assessed value (approximately $685,000) annually, while bonds are outstanding, with citizens' oversight, audits, and all funds staying local?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Columbia Elementary School District to issue $11.5 million in bonds, levied at an average of $23.49 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $685,000 annually), to repair and modernize Columbia Elementary and Mountain View Middle schools.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. NoNo58.8%1,479
    2. YesYes41.2%1,035
    Shasta County count6 of 6 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Measure E – Shasta County, Charter Amendment: Eminent Domain LimitsYes/No question
    Measure EBallot question

    Shall Measure E (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would restrict the County's authority to exercise eminent domain to acquire property from any private owner, without such owner's consent, when the purpose of the acquisition is to convey the property acquired to any private party.

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote adds a Shasta County Charter provision barring the County from using eminent domain to take private property without the owner's consent in order to convey it to another private party.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes65.7%26,945
    2. NoNo34.3%14,088
    Shasta County count61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Measure F – Shasta County, Charter Amendment: Filling Elected Department Head VacanciesYes/No question
    Measure FBallot question

    Shall Measure F (Adding to the Shasta County Charter) be adopted? This measure adds a subsection to the Shasta County Charter. The proposed addition would allow for members of the Board of Supervisors to appoint or call for a special election to fill an unplanned mid-term vacancy of designated elected department heads.

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote adds a Shasta County Charter provision letting the Board of Supervisors either appoint a replacement or call a special election when a designated elected department head leaves office mid-term.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes67.5%27,175
    2. NoNo32.5%13,116
    Shasta County count61 of 68 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Measure G – Shasta Fire Protection District, Board of Trustees Increase From 3 to 5Yes/No question
    Measure GBallot question

    A YES vote would allow the Shasta Fire Protection District to increase its Governing Board from 3 members to 5 members to provide better representation for the district. Shall an ordinance authorizing an increase of the existing 3-person Board of Trustees to a 5-person Board of Trustees be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote enlarges the Shasta Fire Protection District's governing board from three to five members.

    Needed to pass

    Majority

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. YesYes75.2%330
    2. NoNo24.8%109
    Shasta County count2 of 2 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters
  • Measure H – Red Bluff Joint Union High School District, School BondYes/No questionNeeds 55% to pass
    Measure HBallot question

    To provide career/ technical education facilities training students for local jobs as nurses, EMTs, firefighters, others; repair/ upgrade deteriorating classrooms and buildings; maintain clean drinking water; improve campus safety, shall Red Bluff Joint Union High School District’s measure authorizing $19,000,000 of bonds at legal rates, raising $1,600,000 annually via levying $19 per $100,000 of assessed value while bonds are outstanding, requiring local control, citizen oversight, audits, public spending disclosure, no money for administrator salaries, be adopted?

    A yes vote means

    A YES vote authorizes Red Bluff Joint Union High School District to issue $19 million in bonds, levied at about $19 per $100,000 of assessed value (about $1.6 million annually), for career-technical facilities and campus repairs.

    Needed to pass

    55%

    Source: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters, Notice of Election, November 3, 2026 General Election ↗
    1. NoNo60.0%60
    2. YesYes40.0%40
    Shasta County count1 of 1 precinctsUpdated November 9, 2026, 12:36 p.m. PTSource: Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters

About this information

County results come from the Shasta County Clerk/Registrar of Voters. Statewide and districtwide totals come from the California Secretary of State. See the source links on each result; counts are semi-official and will change until certification, and no winners are called here.